Sunday, July 26, 2009

Technology Dependence

A few days ago I lost my Bluetooth headset. It was tragic. In fact it was so traumatic that it bothered me for the rest of the evening. I kept checking and rechecking all my pockets. I just couldn't believe my headset was gone!

It wasn't so much losing the headset—it's so small I'm surprised I didn't lose it sooner—as it was how it affected me. I felt lost. I thought about how convenient it was and how much I took it for granted.

As the evening wore on, I continued thinking about my missing Motorola H710 headset. It was less than a year old and it would cost over $80 to replace it. But on the bright side, it did give me an opportunity to "upgrade" my headset.

The more I thought about my lost headset, the more I realized how dependent we've become on modern technology. Cell phones, laptop PCs, Google, GPS systems, not to mention the Internet. I couldn't imagine not having these technological conveniences.

Judging by all the people I see using cell phones, GPS devices, iPods and all other types of technical gadgets, I'm pretty sure most everyone is just as addicted to technology as I am.

But is this a bad thing? I don't think so. Technology is meant to make our lives easier, better, more convenient. And when it's gone, we miss it.

So the next time we answer a cell phone call, send a text message, check email on a Blackberry, enter a destination on a GPS device, playback a DVR recording, or just flip on a light switch, let's take a moment to think about how much we depend on technology.

Let's just make sure we continue paying that electric bill.

By Harry Hiles, HBH Technology LLC — 26 Jul 2009
HBH Technology LLC

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

T-Mobile's Next Android

T-Mobile USA recently announced their second Android based phone, the myTouch 3G with Google. This follow-on product to last year's T-Mobile G1 greatly improves on the somewhat kludgy design of the G1, which I held off from buying.

The T-Mobile myTouch 3G will be available in early August. However, existing customers (like me) can pre-order the myTouch 3G starting July 8th. And from what I've seen and read about this phone, I'm definitely placing my order on the 8th.

The myTouch 3G differs from the G1 in many ways. It's sleek, shiny and lacks the physical keyboard of its predecessor. This means text entry is done solely with the on-screen keyboard introduced in the Android 1.5 release. The absence of a physical keyboard also makes this handset thinner and lighter than the G1, which is a much appreciated change.

Now I know a lot of people prefer a physical keyboard, and the lack of one is often cited as the biggest deterrent to buying an iPhone. But since I don't send many text messages (SMS, IM, tweets, email, etc.), the added weight and size of a physical keyboard provides little value for me.

Like the G1, the myTouch 3G runs on T-Mobile's 3G network, which they have been furiously deploying throughout the US. The myTouch 3G has a 3.2 inch touch screen with 320x480 HVGA resolution and virtual keyboard in either landscape or portrait mode. There are hard buttons for home, menu, back, search, call start and call end, plus a recessed track ball. In addition to white, the myTouch 3G comes in black and merlot (dark red).

The myTouch 3G is actually T-Mobile's branded version of the HTC Magic, which was released in Europe by Vodaphone earlier this year (Europe seems to get new phone models sooner than the US). Although very similar to the Magic, the myTouch 3G differs in a few areas.

According to T-Mobile and others who have been up close and personal with the phone, its specs include:
  • 3.2 megapixel camera for photos and video.
  • 192 MB internal memory plus an external 4 GB microSD™ memory card.
  • Bluetooth 2.0 with Enhanced Data Rate and A2DP for wireless stereo headsets.
  • Wi-Fi support for IEEE 802.11 b/g.
  • Web browser, music player, video playback, email, and MMS.
  • One click upload to YouTube videos and Picasa photos.
  • Google integration for search, maps, and Gmail with contacts/calendar sync.
  • Microsoft Exchange support.
  • G-sensor and Digital Compass.
  • Geodelic Sherpa™ app recommendation engine for location relevant information.
  • Rechargeable 1340 mAh Lithium-ion battery.
  • 4.45 x 2.19 x 0.54 inches, 4.09 ounces with battery.
Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the myTouch 3G is Google's open source Android OS. Developed by the Open Handset Alliance and based on the open Linux Kernel, Android was designed from the ground up to be a free, fully open platform that allows developers access to all of the phone's core functionality. Unlike the tightly controlled proprietary OSes like Symbian, iPhone, Blackberry and Windows Mobile, Android doesn't differentiate between third-party apps and the phone's core applications.

There are thousands of apps available in the Android Market that you can use to customize the phone to you exact needs. The unofficial price is $199 with a 2-year contract, which puts it on par with the iPhone 3G S and the Palm Pre.

From what I can tell so far, the myTouch 3G is a great smartphone that improves on the disappointing G1. I can hardly wait to get one to see just how well it performs. I'm pretty sure I won't be disappointed.

By Harry Hiles, HBH Technology LLC — 7 Jul 2009
HBH Technology LLC

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Wireless Power: Cutting The Final Cord

Wireless technology is becoming more pervasive everyday. From ubiquitous cell phones and Wi-Fi enabled laptop computers, to other wireless devices such as music players, audio speakers, headphones and security systems, we use wireless technology every day.

While some wireless devices are powered by batteries, either rechargeable or single-use throwaways, others need to be physically connected to a power source. Even rechargeable batteries like those in cell phones and laptop computers need to be plugged in at some point to recharge them.

This need to connect wireless devices to a power source, either continuously or for an occasional recharge, limits these devices from achieving real wireless status.

Cutting the Cord

Eliminating the power cord has long been the dream of many inventors and innovators. Although a few "proximity chargers" are available today that effectively eliminate the cord between the device and the charger, they still require the device to be in close physical contact (more on this later).

Imagine if everything that we now plug into electrical outlets (also referred to as "convenience outlets") could get their power from a wireless source while we use it! Batteries in cell phones and portable computers would be continually recharged. Appliances and equipment normally tethered by a power cord would become truly portable, receiving power from nearby wireless transmitters.

As unbelievable as this sounds, we're very close to realizing true wireless power.

Early Attempts

Wireless power transmission is not a new idea. In fact, Nikola Tesla, one of the first pioneers in wireless power technology during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, demonstrated that wireless power transmission was possible.

Tesla's last attempt at wireless power transmission on a global scale was the New York based Wardenclyffe Tower. Unfortunately, Tesla's funding ran out before he completed the project, and the tower was dismantled in 1917.

After Wardenclyffe, Tesla did very little work with wireless power distribution. Although others such as Hidetsugu Yagi tried to reintroduce wireless power transmission, there was little advancement until the 1960s when William C. Brown began experimenting with power transmission using microwave technology.

21st Century Wireless Power

Today, wireless energy transmission technologies of various types continue to be developed in theory and in practice. One type requires very close proximity to the source. Another can transmit power over several meters, and others can span many miles. There's even a technology that seemingly plucks energy from the air.

One example of existing wireless power technology is the cordless toothbrush that recharges its battery using inductive coupling without a direct electrical connection. In this example of close proximity wireless power, the battery inside the toothbrush is recharged by a magnetic field generated by the charging base using current from an electrical outlet. When the toothbrush is placed in the base, the base's magnetic field induces an electric current in the toothbrush and recharges the battery.

Nascent products from WildCharge, Powermat, and others charge cell phones and other devices just by laying them on a charging mat. Although these products use close proximity inductive power transmission to recharge the devices, they still have at least one power cord.

Continuing Development

Marin Soljačić, an MIT professor, is leading a team to develop near-field wireless power transmission using a technology called strongly coupled magnetic resonance (what's this?). This technology relies on a transmitter and receiver that are "in tune" with each other to transfer energy over several meters. Soljačić founded WiTricity to develop this technology, which he says is safe for people and animals.

The Intel Wireless Resonant Energy Link (WREL) project is building on the MIT research. According to an article in The Register, Intel used their WREL technology to power light bulbs, audio speakers, and even a netbook computer over a one meter distance. Intel is working to improve WREL efficiency and to scale down the large prototype to a size more practical for laptops and cellphones.

The ZigBee Alliance is promoting a technology that harvests energy from many sources (such as ambient radio waves) in the surrounding environment. Although energy harvesting is not a wireless power transmission technology in the strictest sense, it does convert ambient energy to electrical power and provides for energy independence in certain applications.

Not Too Distant Future

Despite the smattering of close proximity wireless chargers, near-field wireless power technologies have done little more than energize light bulbs over the past 100 years, researchers are confident that practical near-field wireless power products will be available to consumers in the next five years. And certainly within the next two decades, near-field wireless power should be commonplace.

Eventually, wireless power transmitters will be embedded within the walls, ceilings and floors of homes, offices and other buildings. We would never have to find a "convenience" outlet to plug in lighting, appliances and electronic equipment – just set them down anywhere in a room and they instantly have power.

Your cell phone and other portable devices will automatically recharge themselves just by walking into a room with them. You'll be able to easily move lamps and TVs anywhere in your home or even outside. And you won't have to worry about forgetting to plug in your electric-powered car. Just pull it in the garage and it'll start recharging automatically.

Now that's convenience.


References:

1. "The Transmission of Electrical Energy Without Wires" by Nikola Tesla. Electrical World, March 5, 1904 (http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1904-03-05.htm).

2. "Intel's Wireless Power Play" by Kate Greene. Technology Review, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22906/).

3. "Wireless Transmission of Electricity" from PESWiki.com, Pure Energy Systems Wiki (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Wireless_Transmission_of_Electricity)

By Harry Hiles, HBH Technology LLC — 2 July 2009
HBH Technology LLC